IBM 00Y8473

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory160GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 160GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIBM 00Y8473  (all builds)
Memory132.4 GB free of 160 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190115
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateAug 10 '20 at 10:34
Run Duration457 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
Socket 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 63.4
2-Core 84
47% 72.5 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 417
39% 322 Pts
64-Core 845
52% 845 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.9% Good
Lighting 79.6
Reflection 65.9
Parallax 70.2
65% 71.9 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 66.9
56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 146GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.27
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,439
Write 1642
Mixed 2340
476% 2,140 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 63
204% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 287
216% 287 MB/s
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
215GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1276 354 313 312 311 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,188
Write 1149
Mixed 570
SusWrite 480
189% 847 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 34.8
116% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 312
230% 303 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 126%
Great: 236%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 599GB
538GB free
Firmware: 3.27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 176 168 186 177 177 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
170% Outstanding
Read 2,237
Write 1411
Mixed 2,035
SusWrite 178
326% 1,465 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 54.8
183% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 276
210% 281 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 170%
Great: 432%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 146GB
98GB free
Firmware: 3.27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 77 76 77 75 74 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
167% Outstanding
Read 2,238
Write 1,348
Mixed 2,180
SusWrite 78.3
325% 1461 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 56.5
191% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 287
218% 291 MB/s
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 1TB
565GB free
Firmware: 3.27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 220 228 220 221 224 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
168% Outstanding
Read 2,044
Write 1,643
Mixed 2,221
SusWrite 226
343% 1,534 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 56.9
193% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 292
220% 292 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 168%
Great: 168%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 239GB
5GB free
Firmware: 3.27
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,816
Write 1467
Mixed 1,832
381% 1,705 MB/s
4K Read 66.4
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 63
217% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 289
220% 295 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 370%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 146GB
60GB free
Firmware: 3.27
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,380
Write 1456
Mixed 2,348
458% 2,062 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 52.1
190% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 287
216% 288 MB/s
Jmicron Generic 1TB
845GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 19
Write 23.5
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 20.2
15% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 2.2
370% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 79%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
57GB free, PID 1031
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.7 7.2 6.8 6.2 6.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
8.55% Terrible
Read 28.3
Write 14
Mixed 9
SusWrite 6.3
16% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
76% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.55%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0-YK0 Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 M393B1G70QH0-YK0 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4A-PB Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 M393B1K70BH1-CH9 M393B1K... 160GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.2% Average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 18.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback