bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory21.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 653 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180727
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 25 '19 at 00:31
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 0, 4 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50% Average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 40.3
2-Core 73.5
41% 61.4 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 321
28% 241 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 256MB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.16.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.03% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 0.08
Parallax 0.03
0% 0.05 fps
MRender 0.05
Gravity 0.03
Splatting 0.09
0% 0.06 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.03%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 70 23 21 37 84 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.8% Below average
Read 184
Write 169
Mixed 162
SusWrite 50.1
32% 141 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 17.8
59% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 31.6
DQ Write 57
DQ Mixed 37.9
31% 42.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB 24GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38.3% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback