Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	98.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 2,742 User benchmarks, average bench 60% Socket-R 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 71.5 2-Core 138 60% 97.9 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 384 39% 317 Pts	64-Core 505 31% 505 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 456GB 611 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 397GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 304 368 362 357 353 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	Read 701 Write 372 Mixed 356 SusWrite 337 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 50.8 4K Mixed 32.4 111% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 308 DQ Write 398 DQ Mixed 300 241% 335 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 129%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 6 6 6 5.8 5.9 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	6.12% Terrible	Read 28.8 Write 5.7 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 5.8 11% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.12% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-140.A00 4x8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	92.9% Outstanding	MC Read 39.7 MC Write 34 MC Mixed 37.9 106% 37.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 9.3 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 93%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	18x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v21stBench 74%, 880 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 66%, 741 samples	7x

RAM
M393B1G70BH0-CK 4x8GBSamsungBench 59%, 8 samples	3x
M393B1K70CH0-CH 4x8GBSamsungBench 51%, 15 samples	3x
M393B2G70DB0-YK 2x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 4 samples	2x

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $222

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16