Today's hottest deals

To Intel X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardTo Intel X79  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200330
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 14:34
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 63.9
2-Core 127
57% 91.7 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 367
39% 309 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.11.2
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Lighting 27.2
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 38.3
22% 31.9 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 29.2
Splatting 28
23% 28.4 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE200 SSD 120GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 50.5
Write 181
Mixed 19
19% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 20.7
82% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 89.5
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 92.4
78% 111 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 82%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$21
126GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 85 85 85 58 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 72.5
Write 65.7
Mixed 52
SusWrite 72.3
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
72GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 59 59 59 57 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 73.8
Write 59.8
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 56.6
43% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 17.9
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 2,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $156
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback