Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM System x3400 M3 Server -[737958M]-

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	IBM System x3400 M3 Server -[737958M]- (all builds)
Motherboard	IBM 69Y4356
Memory	21.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110629
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '19 at 19:01
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620 5,965 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	52.2% Above average	Memory 61.4 1-Core 60.8 2-Core 122 48% 81.2 Pts	4-Core 237 8-Core 313 35% 275 Pts	64-Core 590 36% 590 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.77% Terrible	Lighting 4.57 Reflection 5.69 Parallax 3.91 4% 4.72 fps	MRender 6.24 Gravity 4.93 Splatting 3.57 4% 4.91 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.77% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 182% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 522 514 521 518 516 512 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	179% Outstanding	Read 1,807 Write 1,568 Mixed 1,881 SusWrite 517 324% 1,443 MB/s	4K Read 69 4K Write 57.2 4K Mixed 59.1 211% 61.8 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 226 173% 233 MB/s
Poor: 179% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 185%
SMART 2GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 0GB free, PID f100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 19.6 Write 11.4 Mixed 9.9 16% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 27% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 16 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	44.8% Average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 16.6 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 8.5 24% 8.43 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback