Today's hottest deals

IBM System x3400 M3 Server -[737958M]-

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIBM System x3400 M3 Server -[737958M]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 69Y4356
Memory20.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110629
Uptime7 Days
Run DateApr 27 '19 at 05:42
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 128
58% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 368
38% 307 Pts
64-Core 637
39% 637 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.31% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 5.62
Parallax 0.06
0% 1.9 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 3.52
4% 4.84 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.31%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 1TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 529 519 514 507 512 515 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
185% Outstanding
Read 1,911
Write 2,036
Mixed 1,979
SusWrite 516
362% 1,610 MB/s
4K Read 71.9
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 60.1
218% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 224
171% 231 MB/s
Poor: 179%
This bench: 185%
Great: 185%
SMART 2GB
0GB free, PID f100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.6
Write 11.4
Mixed 10
16% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 16 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
46.9% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 16.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback