bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory24.7 GB free of 28 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 31 '19 at 14:10
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2698B v3
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 68.6
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 165
58% 102 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 163
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 67%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 17 56 57 59 59 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.5% Below average
Read 102
Write 17
Mixed 99.9
SusWrite 41.2
14% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 2.2
82% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 41.7
DQ Write 39.5
DQ Mixed 40.6
30% 40.6 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 78%
Virtual HD 60GB
51GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 99.6
Write 49.3
Mixed 99.3
18% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 24.1
4K Mixed 16.6
55% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 41.1
DQ Write 40.3
DQ Mixed 40.9
31% 40.8 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 28GB
null MHz
1024, 27648 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 33.6
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.4
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback