bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System
Motherboard	congatec TM77/TS77/BS77/BP77
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140614
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '19 at 10:37
Run Duration	270 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 1047UE 3 User benchmarks, average bench 42% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.1% Average	Memory 77.9 1-Core 38.6 2-Core 76 43% 64.2 Pts	4-Core 75.4 8-Core 75.8 10% 75.6 Pts	64-Core 73.6 5% 73.6 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2010) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.42% Terrible	Lighting 1.47 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 1.12 1% 1.34 fps	MRender 2.81 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 2.87 2% 2.19 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.42% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 78 39 9.4 77 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 327 Write 247 Mixed 213 SusWrite 62.3 47% 212 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 18.9 4K Mixed 14.8 53% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 17.7 DQ Write 26.7 DQ Mixed 21.2 16% 21.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 53%
Kingston SMS200S330G 30GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 27GB free Firmware: 541ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 30 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.4% Below average	Read 187 Write 64.7 Mixed 103 SusWrite 28.4 21% 95.7 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 35.2 4K Mixed 22.8 81% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 29.5 DQ Write 66.2 DQ Mixed 33.1 29% 42.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 62%
Kingston SUV500MS120G 120GB 533 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 111GB free Firmware: 003056RI SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 79 44 9.9 76 67 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.3% Below average	Read 211 Write 204 Mixed 176 SusWrite 63.6 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 29.1 4K Mixed 22.7 80% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 30.4 DQ Write 71.1 DQ Mixed 37.2 32% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 79%
Siliconsystems INC 2GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free Firmware: 241-0230 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.6% Terrible	Read 9.3 Write 4.3 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 4.8 4% 6.05 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 290% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.6% Great: 5%
CactusFlashCard 4GB 3GB free Firmware: 15-04-10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$8 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 14GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 38.6 Write 17 Mixed 22.6 SusWrite 16.7 29% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 3 197% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 35%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$8 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 12GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 14 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 38.6 Write 12.9 Mixed 18.6 SusWrite 13.2 24% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 3.1 221% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 35%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$8 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 13GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 15 15 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 15.7 Mixed 19 SusWrite 15.3 26% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 2.8 197% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 35%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$8 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 13GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 15.6 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 13.4 25% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 2.8 200% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 35%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$8 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 9GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 38.2 Write 13.2 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 13.2 24% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 3 215% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 1x4GB 3,518 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	29.9% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 9.5 28% 9.97 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 8.8 24% 8.27 GB/s	Latency 84.5 47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,030x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,573x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	936x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,047x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	426x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	517x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16