bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel NUC6i7KYB
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160503
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 30 '16 at 14:36
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6770HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 98
2-Core 180
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 560
53% 438 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro 580 (Mobile Skylake)
Intel(8086 2064) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4481
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 16.7
14% 15.4 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 15.7
Splatting 25.7
15% 17.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 499
Write 384
Mixed 409
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 21.9
119% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 36.6
DQ Write 72.5
DQ Mixed 21.6
26% 43.6 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 131%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 79% Great: 131%
Kingston DataTraveler II+ 2GB
1GB free, PID 1601
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
6.39% Terrible
Read 23.3
Write 10.1
Mixed 13.7
18% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.06
4K Mixed 0.06
14% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.39%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2800 C18 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 47.9
MC Write 55.7
MC Mixed 26.3
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 20.3
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 113%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback