Today's hottest deals

Lenovo F0CB00R3CD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo F0CB00R3CD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SKYBAY
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161012
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateApr 14 '19 at 06:55
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$50
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 91.3
1-Core 84
2-Core 108
62% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 144
15% 123 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 36BC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4565
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Lighting 2.97
Reflection 4.69
Parallax 2.78
2% 3.48 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 2.67
Splatting 8.17
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon LJH-128V2G 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FJ70106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 115 105 107 101 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 406
Write 139
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 103
40% 184 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 16
81% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 149
123% 179 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
527GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 87 76 99 77 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 108
Write 107
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 86.6
68% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-010.A00G Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.3% Above average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 18.9
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 12
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback