LG 15N540-MF5SKN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLG 15N540-MF5SKN  (all builds)
MotherboardLG White Tip Mountain
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151126
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateApr 16 '20 at 00:59
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
62% Good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 150
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 212
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 62%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Device(1854 0213) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4463
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
3% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 5.23
Parallax 4.97
3% 4.5 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 6.3
4% 4.14 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon LJH-128V2G 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FJ70106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 144 146 146 147 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 478
Write 146
Mixed 202
SusWrite 145
53% 243 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 28.7
101% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 150
124% 182 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 68%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
459GB free
Firmware: AM0P5L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 118 119 119 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 112
Write 112
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 118
68% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
29.6% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.4
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback