Asrock 760GM-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 760GM-HDV (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180511
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '19 at 06:29
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4100-$110 32,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Memory 77.6 1-Core 58.9 2-Core 97.9 50% 78.1 Pts	4-Core 125 8-Core 128 17% 127 Pts	64-Core 126 8% 126 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3418) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.1 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.8% Average	Lighting 53.9 Reflection 69.1 Parallax 97.2 44% 73.4 fps	MRender 67.3 Gravity 71.3 Splatting 56.7 52% 65.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 195 205 212 217 217 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.6% Good	Read 241 Write 219 Mixed 212 SusWrite 204 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 33.7 109% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 144 108% 143 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 124%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 300GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 92 93 95 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 91.8 Write 92.3 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 93.2 62% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 8GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 12.1 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 8.6 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 85.2 47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 760GM-HDV Builds (Compare 307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 760GM-HDV

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	121x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	63x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	46x

GPU
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	37x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 2,092 samples	8x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	48x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 3,584 samples	15x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16