Asrock FM2A78M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A78M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateApr 20 '19 at 18:44
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 114
54% 86 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 188
25% 185 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.3
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51% Above average
Lighting 61.3
Reflection 65.9
Parallax 94.6
50% 73.9 fps
MRender 69.8
Gravity 71
Splatting 56.9
53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 285 322 328 328 298 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 346
Write 326
Mixed 320
SusWrite 305
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 33.7
108% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 35.4
DQ Write 77.3
DQ Mixed 48.5
39% 53.7 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
373GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 149 151 149 149 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 118
Write 83
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 149
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5474-013.A00LF 99U5471-025.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.4% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 10.1
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.5
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A78M-HD+ Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A78M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $136
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback