Asus H61M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H61M-A  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateApr 22 '19 at 15:22
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600S-$235
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 87
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 156
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 372
39% 314 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1220 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.4.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Lighting 26.1
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 37.1
21% 31.5 fps
MRender 30.7
Gravity 26
Splatting 34.9
25% 30.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 161 234 107 3.4 66 MB/s
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55% Above average
Read 258
Write 234
Mixed 236
SusWrite 95.6
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 24.9
98% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 49
79% 151 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
269GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 173 177 176 177 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 132
Mixed 72
SusWrite 175
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
104GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 177 184 189 188 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 154
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 183
96% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 107%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 2TB-$121
31GB free
Firmware: CV27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 178 170 151 170 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 167
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 168
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 113%
External USB3.0 1TB
149GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 8 8.1 8 8 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 27.7
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 8.1
16% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 72%
Mass Storage Device 2TB
792GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7.7 7.7 7.6 7.7 7.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 25.5
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 7.7
28% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 27%
Seagate Portable 500GB
113GB free, PID 2300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 7.7 7.6 7.7 7.6 8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.68% Terrible
Read 30.5
Write 24.8
Mixed 20
SusWrite 7.7
26% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.68%
Great: 19%
WDC WD50 00LPCX-24C6HT0 500GB
419GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.6 7.6 7.5 7.7 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 24.3
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 8.1
28% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 21%
JMicron Generic 1TB
1GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.5
Write 23.5
Mixed 20
30% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 222%
WDC WD50 00AAJB-00YRA0 500GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7.4 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 28
Write 23
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 7.6
25% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.2% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14.5
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-A Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $86
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback