Today's hottest deals

Asrock H61M-VS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VS  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '19 at 18:57
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 179
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 355
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Lighting 73
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 90.7
60% 77.8 fps
MRender 72.2
Gravity 74
Splatting 57.3
54% 67.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 81 79 83 87 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28% Poor
Read 164
Write 82.2
Mixed 86
SusWrite 81.5
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 12.8
51% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 22.8
DQ Write 15.9
DQ Mixed 19.1
14% 19.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 28%
Great: 66%
Corsair Force 80GB-$67
58GB free
Firmware: 2.1a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 56 51 40 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 148
Write 58
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 49.7
18% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 23.9
96% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25.5
DQ Write 59.5
DQ Mixed 26.5
25% 37.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VS Builds (Compare 384 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $74
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback