Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive17.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming K3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '18 at 14:28
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$135
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 137
2-Core 278
93% 169 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 898
87% 718 Pts
64-Core 1,142
71% 1,142 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 6188) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.1% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 5.92
Parallax 4.28
4% 5.07 fps
MRender 7.33
Gravity 5.07
Splatting 3.52
4% 5.31 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.1%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 80GB-$67
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.1a Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 78.5
Write 35
Mixed 48.7
12% 54 MB/s
4K Read 9.47
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 4.61
36% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 55.6
DQ Write 33.5
DQ Mixed 15.7
19% 34.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 40%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60
224GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 75.8
Write 75
Mixed 71.9
56% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.47
106% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF Builds (Compare 1,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $479
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback