Dell XPS 8900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDell XPS 8900  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XJ8C4
Memory31.2 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190110
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 26 '19 at 20:42
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 209
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 581
58% 471 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.9% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 109
Parallax 113
92% 112 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 96.6
Splatting 81.8
82% 103 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 354 400 377 379 364 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 434
Mixed 371
SusWrite 379
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 44.5
160% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 155
125% 181 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 100%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
173GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 263 265 266 267 265 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 403
Write 258
Mixed 290
SusWrite 265
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 32.1
124% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 184
166% 252 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 89%
ST1000DM003-1SB102 500GB
399GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 408 414 432 432 436 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 457
Write 427
Mixed 389
SusWrite 420
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 53.4
180% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 337
255% 342 MB/s
Poor: 88% Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
769GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 189 190 192 192 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 95.5
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 191
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Seagate BUP SL 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 130 129 130 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 99.2
Write 123
Mixed 73
SusWrite 129
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
181% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 67%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
3TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 40
Write 38.5
Mixed 33
SusWrite 40.8
52% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate Portable 640GB
596GB free, PID 2300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 41 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 40
Write 36.7
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 41.7
48% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 17%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
752GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 39 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 39.8
Write 36
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 39.6
49% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
28% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 59%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
3TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 53 53 53 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 51.5
Write 49.3
Mixed 45
SusWrite 52.3
68% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 859B0000802C CT16G4DFD8213.M16FB 859B0000802C CT16G4DFD8213.M16FB 40GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.5% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 21.5
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 19.2
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8900 Builds (Compare 2,776 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $370
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback