MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A31
MotherboardMSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31)  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190124
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 27 '19 at 13:42
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 77.5
1-Core 126
2-Core 253
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 964
87% 731 Pts
64-Core 1,385
86% 1,385 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1454 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.3.1
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.1% Very good
Lighting 91.9
Reflection 74.5
Parallax 108
75% 91.5 fps
MRender 78.6
Gravity 122
Splatting 114
87% 105 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 255GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 179 181 185 188 188 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 708
Write 546
Mixed 481
SusWrite 210
108% 486 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 28
108% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 507
DQ Mixed 195
191% 291 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 199%
Amd-raid GIGABYTE GP-GSM2 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: E8TM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 169 207 223 179 188 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 792
Write 849
Mixed 787
SusWrite 198
147% 656 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 26.5
110% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 584
DQ Mixed 283
246% 349 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 94%
Great: 179%
Amd-raid WDC WD1003FZEX-0 1TB
868GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 109 111 112 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 178
Write 174
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 108
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 176%
Amd-raid WDC WD5000AAKS-0 500GB
24GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 66 69 69 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 70.7
Write 73.2
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 66.4
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 65%
Amd-raid WDC WD20EZRZ-00Z 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 94 102 107 110 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 120
Write 111
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 104
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL17-17-17 D4-2400 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback