EVGA 151-SX-E299

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive494% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemEVGA Default string
MotherboardEVGA 151-SX-E299  (all builds)
Memory54.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180312
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateMay 02 '19 at 23:56
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7940X-$647
CPU0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 82.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 247
78% 144 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 1,021
86% 745 Pts
64-Core 2,396
148% 2,396 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan V
Nvidia(10DE 1218) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1912 MHz, MLim: 425 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
142% Outstanding
Lighting 199
Reflection 185
Parallax 260
162% 215 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 218
Splatting 105
132% 169 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 142%
Great: 155%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010325 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1686 1691 1683 1626 1704 1752 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
494% Outstanding
Read 2,195
Write 1798
Mixed 1,932
SusWrite 1,690
428% 1,904 MB/s
4K Read 242
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 241
798% 238 MB/s
DQ Read 1,298
DQ Write 1,113
DQ Mixed 1,180
891% 1,197 MB/s
Poor: 302%
This bench: 494%
Great: 559%
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
96GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 55 56 55 55 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 412
Write 364
Mixed 300
SusWrite 86.9
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 23.4
119% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 135
132% 204 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 85%
LT1600KEXVB 1.5TB
649GB free
Firmware: 4IFDHPK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1283 1280 1273 1278 1420 1408 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 677
Write 1,464
Mixed 728
SusWrite 1,324
239% 1,048 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 248
4K Mixed 53.7
255% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,376
DQ Write 1,202
DQ Mixed 1,095
874% 1,224 MB/s
Poor: 198%
This bench: 241%
Great: 247%
Intel SSDPE2MX020T4F 2TB
451GB free
Firmware: 8DV1FX09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1730 1726 1706 1700 1718 1702 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 978
Write 1716
Mixed 840
SusWrite 1,714
298% 1,312 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 247
4K Mixed 51.4
246% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,355
DQ Write 1,194
DQ Mixed 1,208
924% 1,252 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 274%
Great: 274%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 65.9
MC Mixed 40.2
141% 49.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 11
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 122%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 151-SX-E299 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: EVGA 151-SX-E299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $986
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback