bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory2.5 GB free of 5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '19 at 18:58
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6138
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 167
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 241
33% 244 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID T4-4Q
Nvidia(10DE 130E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Lighting 89.2
Reflection 103
Parallax 95.1
73% 95.8 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 26.9
21% 25.6 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 9GB
8GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,030
Write 207
Mixed 381
117% 539 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 12.6
56% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 87.9
DQ Write 83.1
DQ Mixed 90.5
67% 87.2 MB/s
Vmware Virtual disk 4GB
4GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,037
Write 149
Mixed 360
111% 516 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 13
60% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 90.8
DQ Write 84.1
DQ Mixed 95.3
69% 90.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 59%
Vmware Virtual disk 43GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 518
Write 112
Mixed 272
226% 301 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 10.1
1,868% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback