Acer Aspire E5-475G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-475G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer AntMan_SK
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '19 at 05:05
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 184
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 270
36% 271 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 110F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4534
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.51% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 9.96
Parallax 6.34
6% 7.77 fps
MRender 7.38
Gravity 6
Splatting 14.3
8% 9.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.51%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-GEN03SM19EG256GP3X4IT 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1115A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 116 161 185 240 151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 974
Write 108
Mixed 196
SusWrite 166
78% 361 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 8
63% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 150
134% 210 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 178%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
778GB free
Firmware: AX1P5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 92 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 94.2
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 90.4
57% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 04CB AM1P24HC4U1-B9RS 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-475G Builds (Compare 595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-475G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback