Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120629
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 19 '19 at 11:33
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 164
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 325
41% 311 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
PNY(196E 0984) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 372.70
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 37.3
27% 32.5 fps
MRender 41.7
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 32.1
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0102) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2618
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.58
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.19 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 125 95 72 21 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 479
Write 421
Mixed 382
SusWrite 101
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 20.4
77% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 0.5
61% 143 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
375GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 180 176 178 179 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 144
Mixed 75
SusWrite 178
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
354GB free, PID 0569
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 67 68 70 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.7% Poor
Read 63.5
Write 62.1
Mixed 42
SusWrite 69.6
80% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 30%
WDC WD20 EADS-00R6B0 2TB
410GB free, PID 0951
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 31 30 31 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.2% Very poor
Read 41.3
Write 29.5
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 30.4
42% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 19%
ST310005 20AS 1TB
163GB free, PID 1018
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 10.8
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 10.8
19% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G3D1869DT2TXOB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 15.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 15.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 Builds (Compare 402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $526
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback