Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 REV 3.1  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120216
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 05 '19 at 20:50
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 180
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 280
36% 271 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 3962) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.8% Below average
Lighting 45.4
Reflection 44
Parallax 39.3
37% 42.9 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 35.5
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 333 266 234 192 173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 435
Write 402
Mixed 306
SusWrite 252
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 29.4
100% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 115
108% 170 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 116%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
377GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 33 38 59 41 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 85
Write 103
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 54.6
45% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 62%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
912GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 102 99 96 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 98.2
Write 103
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 99.7
112% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 43%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
659GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 18 14 6.6 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 86.3
Write 80.7
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 37.9
97% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 48%
Generic- SD/MMC 128GB
80GB free, PID 8468
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 17 13 22 16 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 77
Write 19
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 17.6
37% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
37% 2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 45%
LaCie Rugged USB-C 2TB
1TB free, PID 108c
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 24 96 20 63 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 69.3
Write 118
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 46.6
108% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
9% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GBH2X02E99924-165 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback