Today's hottest deals

HP xw8600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP xw8600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A98h
Memory49.4 GB free of 64.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '19 at 13:33
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5450
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 57.6
1-Core 43.1
2-Core 86
39% 62.2 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 331
30% 251 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8428) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.05% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 9.23
Parallax 11.7
8% 10.4 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 12
Splatting 13
10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EG0900FBLSK 900GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPD5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 46 43 46 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 106
Write 44.6
Mixed 54
SusWrite 41.8
46% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 88%
HP EG0900FBLSK 900GB
829GB free
Firmware: HPD5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 54 54 54 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 150
Write 53.7
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 52.3
59% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.1
193% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58%
Great: 88%
HP EG0900FBLSK 900GB
799GB free
Firmware: HPD3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 50 54 53 54 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 156
Write 54.1
Mixed 64
SusWrite 52.2
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 88%
HP EG0900FBLSK 900GB
644GB free
Firmware: HPD5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 51 52 52 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 141
Write 52.1
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 50.1
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41
1TB free
Firmware: NA00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 110 121 117 121 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 128
Write 120
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 116
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST3000VN000-1HJ166 802GB
561GB free
Firmware: SC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 150 159 159 161 145 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.7% Excellent
Read 151
Write 115
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 155
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 91%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
187GB free
Firmware: 1118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 87 94 93 94 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 71.4
Write 77.8
Mixed 51.1
SusWrite 90.7
54% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 97GB
null MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 33792 MB
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 8.6
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw8600 Workstation Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw8600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback