Today's hottest deals

Asus A68HM-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive9.32% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-K  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170527
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 07 '19 at 12:51
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 840 Quad Core
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 69
1-Core 61.7
2-Core 119
50% 83.2 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 169
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Asus(1043 84E1) 2GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 20.2
18% 19.8 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 22.3
Splatting 17
17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 1TB
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 83 86 88 78 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.32% Terrible
Read 93
Write 90
Mixed 40
SusWrite 81.3
17% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
2% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.32%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 160C0 V3 Series 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
33.4% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 13.4
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 9.2
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-K Builds (Compare 655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback