Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20244

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20244  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory1.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131210
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 29 '16 at 19:04
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 44.9
2-Core 110
40% 68.7 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 161
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2778
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.09% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 3.08
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.31 fps
MRender 3.24
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.52
3% 3.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.09%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 323
Write 183
Mixed 155
48% 220 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 7.87
53% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26.9
DQ Write 37.1
DQ Mixed 9.7
14% 24.6 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 6GB
1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.5% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 12.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 3%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20244 Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20244

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback