Asrock H67M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsrock H67M  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '19 at 06:40
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550S
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 192
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 360
48% 362 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Lighting 66.8
Reflection 68.4
Parallax 82.7
54% 72.6 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 64.9
Splatting 56.1
51% 62.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 158 156 163 143 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 467
Write 162
Mixed 202
SusWrite 154
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 21.1
82% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 58.2
DQ Mixed 96.6
91% 150 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 76%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
3GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 60.3
Write 61.2
Mixed 46
42% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
114GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 125 123 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 94
Write 103
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 124
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 70%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
152GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 100 99 102 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 92.5
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 99.8
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55%
Great: 100%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
8GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 106 109 115 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 133
Write 129
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 103
154% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
132% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 60%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
687GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 101 101 105 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 142
Write 99
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 103
133% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
169% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FLGF65F-C8KL9A 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
63% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 20.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 18
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67M Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H67M - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $350
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback