Asus P8H77-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-V  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120228
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateAug 08 '19 at 06:59
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 84
2-Core 169
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 327
44% 326 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Asus(1043 8400) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 5.85
Parallax 4
4% 4.93 fps
MRender 6.67
Gravity 4.93
Splatting 0.13
3% 3.91 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 06.01D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 21 12 10 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 51.1
Write 49.8
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 21.2
29% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 33%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
172GB free
Firmware: 12.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 71 71 73 72 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 76.5
Write 72.9
Mixed 51
SusWrite 72
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
384GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 26 18 16 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 123
Write 124
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 25.5
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 109%
USB3.0 FLASH DRIVE 32GB
29GB free, PID b128
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 15 15 11 9.6 9.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
7.91% Terrible
Read 31
Write 14.7
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 12
22% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.91%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FLGF65F-C8KL9A 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.2% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-V Builds (Compare 990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $566
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback