Today's hottest deals

Asus Maximus IV GENE-Z

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV GENE-Z  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJul 10 '22 at 02:58
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 181
75% 126 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 533
54% 439 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1281 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.4.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 61.5
Parallax 82.2
0% 47.9 fps
MRender 62.6
Gravity 66.9
Splatting 45.1
46% 58.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.01B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 30 31 26 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 49.9
Write 46.9
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 29.5
31% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.1% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 9
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus IV GENE-Z Builds (Compare 450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV GENE-Z - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback