Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Memory 41.1 1-Core 20.7 2-Core 38.9 23% 33.6 Pts	4-Core 41.9 8-Core 37.5 5% 39.7 Pts	64-Core 29.3 2% 29.3 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 106D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.34% Terrible	Lighting 1.57 Reflection 2.23 Parallax 2.34 1% 2.05 fps	MRender 1.76 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 1.91 2% 1.78 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.34% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
USB 2.0 PenDrive 2GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 2GB free, PID 4567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 11 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 19.5 Write 15 Mixed 11 SusWrite 14.4 20% 15 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 4.8 311% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4BDG1646Q-HYKO 1x2GB 90 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 4.3 15% 5.23 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 18%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16