Today's hottest deals

Bangho MAX G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4.01GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.01GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemBangho MAX G5  (all builds)
MotherboardNOTEBOOK MAX G5
Memory1.4 GB free of 4.00586 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160621
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 01 '22 at 16:52
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3050
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Memory 47.4
1-Core 19
2-Core 38.1
24% 34.8 Pts
4-Core 38.7
8-Core 40.5
5% 39.6 Pts
64-Core 39
2% 39 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 27%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Clevo(1558 0242) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.45% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1
Parallax 2.5
1% 1.7 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.45%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 63 47 40 33 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 92.8
Write 87.4
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 43.1
51% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF160BJ.C8F MXIC 25L/U Series 42GB
1600, 0 MHz
4096, 38912 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 5.2
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.3
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 171
24% 171 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAX G5 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Bangho MAX G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $155
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback