Supermicro X9DRW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSupermicro X9DRW  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRW
Memory61.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '19 at 21:00
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2603 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 76.6
1-Core 50.4
2-Core 99.9
48% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 377
34% 289 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 400
Nvidia(10DE 0893) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 327.2
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.04% Terrible
Lighting 2.63
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 1.12
2% 2.48 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 1.83
Splatting 1.91
2% 2.31 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.04%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 134 134 134 134 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 481
Write 401
Mixed 285
SusWrite 155
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 38.9
136% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 161
169% 279 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0-YK0 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.2% Good
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 21.1
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4.3
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DRW Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Supermicro X9DRW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback