Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	79.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus Z10PE-D16 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory	120.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170310
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '19 at 21:49
Run Duration	360 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 987 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Memory 53.3 1-Core 77.5 2-Core 152 52% 94.2 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 613 54% 460 Pts	64-Core 1998 124% 1998 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% EVGA(3842 1161) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Lighting 94.2 Reflection 84 Parallax 73.4 77% 83.9 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 78.4 Splatting 73.6 61% 74.4 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 73%
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.6% Very good	Lighting 97.4 Reflection 109 Parallax 103 79% 103 fps	MRender 96.2 Gravity 96 Splatting 99.9 80% 97.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 960GB-$397 1,581 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 894GB free Firmware: 001B SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 116 110 110 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 359 Write 425 Mixed 324 SusWrite 110 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 70.2 4K Mixed 34 120% 43.3 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 66.5 114% 222 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 111%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$96 85,928 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 630GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 357 285 268 249 251 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	130% Outstanding	Read 657 Write 557 Mixed 561 SusWrite 300 116% 519 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 89.7 4K Mixed 61.3 202% 67 MB/s	DQ Read 543 DQ Write 466 DQ Mixed 498 375% 502 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 372%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$90 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 305GB free Firmware: R070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 115 110 109 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 297 Write 422 Mixed 348 SusWrite 110 66% 294 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 72.6 4K Mixed 35.3 120% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 302 228% 306 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 105%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$90 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 536GB free Firmware: R070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 152 153 149 152 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 291 Write 373 Mixed 248 SusWrite 152 60% 266 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 74.2 4K Mixed 25.3 102% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 267 DQ Mixed 307 221% 283 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 105%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 332GB free Firmware: R070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 421 312 247 249 247 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Read 310 Write 425 Mixed 348 SusWrite 316 79% 350 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 72.7 4K Mixed 34.4 120% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 328 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 301 226% 303 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 99%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 1,997 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2.5TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 96 97 96 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 101 Write 100 Mixed 75.4 SusWrite 96 21% 93.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 0.6 6% 3.33 MB/s	DQ Read 1.2 DQ Write 7.7 DQ Mixed 1.9 2% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 18%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: ACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 148 148 144 139 142 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 140 Write 142 Mixed 37 SusWrite 144 84% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 134% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2.5TB free Firmware: ACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 109 105 105 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 128 Write 182 Mixed 32.2 SusWrite 105 81% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 108%
Seagate ST8000NE0021-2EN 8TB 98 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 3TB free Firmware: EN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 11 19 19 21 11 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 67% Great: 127%
Inateck 2TB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 127 127 124 126 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 123 Write 92.5 Mixed 66.9 SusWrite 124 134% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1.1 186% 2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 61%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 20TB 307 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 11TB free, PID 25f6 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 338 330 326 323 326 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 286 Write 300 Mixed 146 SusWrite 328 359% 265 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 141%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M386A4G40DM1-CRC 4x31.8GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 4 of 16 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.9% Good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 20.9 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 15.5 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 286 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 72%

Battleship

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31stBench 66%, 886 samples	24x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples	22x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples	17x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	26x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	22x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	18x

SSD
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)WD $74Bench 277%, 114,373 samples	11x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	26x
HMA84GR7MFR4N-TF 4x31.8GBHynixBench 85%, 82 samples	11x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $324

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16