Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5410 249 User benchmarks, average bench 42% XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Memory 64.8 1-Core 33.6 2-Core 67.2 37% 55.2 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 263 24% 199 Pts	64-Core 264 16% 264 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 370 1024SP 18 User benchmarks, average bench 23% PowerColor(148C 9370) ≥ 4GB CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	24.6% Poor	Lighting 29.8 Reflection 31.7 Parallax 35.5 24% 32.4 fps	MRender 28.7 Gravity 23.6 Splatting 37.5 25% 29.9 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6C SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 222 135 124 144 134 MB/s Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.5% Above average	Read 259 Write 240 Mixed 241 SusWrite 167 51% 227 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 24.9 98% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 47.5 71% 134 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 92%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 5GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 5.1 6 6 6 6 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 12.8 Write 7.2 Mixed 10 SusWrite 5.1 11% 8.77 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 2.5 171% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 49GB 1,461 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	19.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 7.8 18% 6.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 5.3 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E54501stBench 47%, 442 samples	19x
CPU: Intel Xeon E54501stBench 47%, 569 samples	15x
CPU: Intel Xeon E54301stBench 46%, 705 samples	10x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $139