MSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS(MS-7B07)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B07
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS(MS-7B07)  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171218
Uptime12.3 Days
Run DateJun 29 '19 at 05:28
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9500 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
42.7% Average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 71
2-Core 113
51% 83.6 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 111
15% 112 Pts
64-Core 113
7% 113 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
MSI(1462 7B07) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.92% Terrible
Lighting 8.97
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 12.3
7% 10.8 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 9.67
Splatting 7.7
6% 7.42 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.92%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 62 55 59 67 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 98
Write 97.3
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 59.1
59% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
45GB free
Firmware: 0002BSM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 49 49 49 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 44.5
Write 47
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 49.1
32% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W641GU42J7240NC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.4% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 9
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VH PLUS(MS-7B07) Builds (Compare 488 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS(MS-7B07)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback