Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8265
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180913
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '22 at 04:46
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A6-8570 R5, 8 COMPUTE CORES 2C+6G
U4500, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
38.7% Below average
Memory 60
1-Core 71.1
2-Core 83.5
46% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 97.7
14% 101 Pts
64-Core 88.2
6% 88.2 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 8265) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
7.07% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 12.7
7% 10.2 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 8.5
6% 7.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.07%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 82 81 103 100 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 140
Write 142
Mixed 87.9
SusWrite 90.1
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.8% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 9.2
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback