Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8265
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161222
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 02 '19 at 17:01
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A6-8570 R5, 8 COMPUTE CORES 2C+6G
U4500, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Memory 33.8
1-Core 35.6
2-Core 62.8
26% 44.1 Pts
4-Core 57.2
8-Core 84.4
9% 70.8 Pts
64-Core 97.8
6% 97.8 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 15.8
14% 15.5 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 17.6
14% 16.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
420GB free
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 164 195 194 194 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 64.5
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 184
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 105%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 42 49 51 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 63.5
Write 60.3
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 46.8
37% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
21.9% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 8.7
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 5.9
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 234
17% 234 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback