Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20179

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20179  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo IdeaPad N585
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20121002
Uptime28.9 Days
Run DateJun 30 '19 at 17:29
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
26.1% Poor
Memory 48.1
1-Core 16.7
2-Core 25.9
23% 30.2 Pts
4-Core 25.3
8-Core 34.7
4% 30 Pts
64-Core 33.8
2% 33.8 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310M
Legend(17AA 397F) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.982.6.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.86% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.35
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.22 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.86%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$42
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 40 29 40 40 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 59.2
Write 40.3
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 40.5
32% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung SAMSUNG-4G1600HS 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.6% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 3.7
8% 2.77 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20179 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback