PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 94.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8Z77-M PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120803 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Jul 11 '19 at 00:24 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | ARG-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
73.6%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 570-$130
ASRock(1849 5031) ≥ 4GB; asrock phantom gaming D
CLim: 1270 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.6.3
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 375 259 254 258 263 MB/s
|
94.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
130GB free
Firmware: 3CNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 55 55 55 55 MB/s
|
30.7%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905403-038.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 185x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 170x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 154x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 53x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 50x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 48x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $650 |