ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-MZ31-AR0-00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MZ31-AR0-00 (all builds)
Memory	50.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190415
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 13 '19 at 14:50
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD EPYC 7351P 16-Core 29 User benchmarks, average bench 59% P0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 73.7 1-Core 89.1 2-Core 174 64% 112 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 496 53% 422 Pts	64-Core 1,974 122% 1,974 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 80%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SEDC500R480G 480GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 427GB free (System drive) Firmware: SCEK SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 464 463 463 463 463 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	101% Outstanding	Read 371 Write 445 Mixed 350 SusWrite 463 92% 407 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 37.1 144% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 303 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 294 222% 297 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 101%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 347GB free Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2209 2219 2221 2223 2203 2160 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	368% Outstanding	Read 2,618 Write 2,204 Mixed 1,479 SusWrite 2,206 477% 2,127 MB/s	4K Read 57.7 4K Write 181 4K Mixed 81.1 287% 107 MB/s	DQ Read 903 DQ Write 880 DQ Mixed 907 677% 896 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 368% Great: 393%
Nvme SAMSUNG MZ1LB960 960GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 218% 806GB free Firmware: EDA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1189 1187 1186 1188 1183 1184 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	257% Outstanding	Read 2,116 Write 1,212 Mixed 1,153 SusWrite 1,186 316% 1,417 MB/s	4K Read 44.8 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 62.3 213% 76.6 MB/s	DQ Read 949 DQ Write 575 DQ Mixed 703 539% 742 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 257% Great: 265%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965690-002.A00G 8x8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	MC Read 34.5 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 29.9 92% 32 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 36.4 SC Mixed 25.6 79% 27.7 GB/s	Latency 93.1 43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback