Gigabyte GA-MZ31-AR0-00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MZ31-AR0-00  (all builds)
Memory50.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190415
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 13 '19 at 14:50
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7351P 16-Core
P0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 174
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 496
53% 422 Pts
64-Core 1,974
122% 1,974 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SEDC500R480G 480GB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SCEK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 464 463 463 463 463 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
101% Outstanding
Read 371
Write 445
Mixed 350
SusWrite 463
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 37.1
144% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 294
222% 297 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
347GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2209 2219 2221 2223 2203 2160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
368% Outstanding
Read 2,618
Write 2,204
Mixed 1,479
SusWrite 2,206
477% 2,127 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 81.1
287% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 903
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 907
677% 896 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 368%
Great: 393%
Nvme SAMSUNG MZ1LB960 960GB
806GB free
Firmware: EDA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1189 1187 1186 1188 1183 1184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 2,116
Write 1,212
Mixed 1,153
SusWrite 1,186
316% 1,417 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 62.3
213% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 949
DQ Write 575
DQ Mixed 703
539% 742 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 257%
Great: 265%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965690-002.A00G 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 29.9
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 25.6
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback