Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Memory 45.9 1-Core 53.4 2-Core 73.9 36% 57.7 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 174 24% 178 Pts	64-Core 177 11% 177 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Lighting 42.7 Reflection 46.1 Parallax 38.7 35% 42.5 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 42.3 Splatting 28.6 29% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SEDC500R480G 480GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 307GB free (System drive) Firmware: SCEK SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 318 351 394 404 410 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64.5% Good	Read 299 Write 374 Mixed 294 SusWrite 356 75% 331 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 20.3 75% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 193 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 157 123% 170 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 101%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB 9,937 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1.5TB free Firmware: 04.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 86 85 87 87 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 89.5 Write 89.7 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 85.5 61% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 6.7 19% 6.77 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.6 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
Series SATA SSD 120GBVBench 63%, 3,411 samples	3x
R5MP120G8 120GBBench 141%, 259 samples	3x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	5x
99U5471-030.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 790 samples	4x
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBUnknownBench 33%, 442 samples	4x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $147