Gigabyte GA-P65

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P65 (all builds)
Memory	20.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '19 at 01:46
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 73.4 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 169 66% 114 Pts	4-Core 252 8-Core 368 39% 310 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Gigabyte(1458 1650) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	2.81% Terrible	Lighting 2.73 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 3.06 2% 5.78 fps	MRender 5.05 Gravity 2.93 Splatting 6.04 4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.81% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B512 512GB 2,348 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: G890109 SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 208 153 148 129 141 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	71% Very good	Read 420 Write 354 Mixed 293 SusWrite 170 69% 309 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 58.1 4K Mixed 30.7 101% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 271 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 139 142% 229 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 106%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 466GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1282 1152 609 618 617 617 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	196% Outstanding	Read 1,481 Write 1,462 Mixed 1,174 SusWrite 816 277% 1,233 MB/s	4K Read 46.1 4K Write 97 4K Mixed 59.8 198% 67.6 MB/s	DQ Read 646 DQ Write 511 DQ Mixed 597 442% 585 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 196% Great: 340%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston CBD24D4S7D8MB-16 KHX2400C14S4/8G 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	66.1% Good	MC Read 24.6 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 20.1 68% 23.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 25.8 SC Mixed 20.2 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 93.7 43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P65 Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P65

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	114x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	64x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	49x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1x

SSD
MX300 SATA M.2 525GBCrucial $140Bench 85%, 20,154 samples	17x
CV1-8B512 512GBLiteonBench 86%, 2,348 samples	13x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	10x

RAM
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,974 samples	26x
CBD24D4S7D8MB-16 1x16GBKingstonBench 42%, 1,209 samples	25x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GBG.SKILLBench 42%, 1,345 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $140

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16