Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 31 '19 at 14:27
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 80.1
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 246
76% 140 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 778
78% 635 Pts
64-Core 961
60% 961 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 115
Parallax 109
91% 112 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 104
Splatting 104
84% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 329
Write 206
Mixed 155
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 19.8
80% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 71.3
DQ Mixed 99.6
95% 155 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 76%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
309GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 50 83 155 74 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 408
Write 310
Mixed 223
SusWrite 84.9
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 1.1
33% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 64.1
DQ Mixed 23.3
35% 67.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 58%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$100
132GB free
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 227 182 161 194 187 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 445
Write 383
Mixed 243
SusWrite 216
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 32.7
116% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 61.2
120% 243 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 107%
Inateck FE2005 240GB
217GB free
Firmware: 8103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 328 342 343 341 343 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 333
Write 342
Mixed 244
SusWrite 339
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 19.8
67% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 67.5
DQ Write 54.3
DQ Mixed 56.6
44% 59.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2133C15-16GIS Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G1B1 F4-2133C15-16GIS Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G1B1 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
106% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 40.5
119% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 20.4
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback