PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180816 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 11 '18 at 01:45 |
Run Duration | 176 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
83.9%
Excellent
|
80% 144 Pts
|
72% 582 Pts
|
53% 856 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.16
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.2%
Average
|
44% 56.1 fps
|
56% 67.8 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 286 261 259 249 241 MB/s
|
109%
Outstanding
|
93% 413 MB/s
|
186% 64.2 MB/s
|
226% 302 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
39GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 297 300 301 302 301 MB/s
|
112%
Outstanding
|
95% 424 MB/s
|
191% 66.2 MB/s
|
226% 302 MB/s
|
![]() Inateck FE2005 240GB
205GB free
Firmware: 8103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 54 33 30 29 29 MB/s
|
38.3%
Below average
|
53% 236 MB/s
|
59% 19.4 MB/s
|
44% 59.5 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
156GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 48 48 46 53 MB/s
|
36.1%
Below average
|
46% 63 MB/s
|
132% 0.97 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
285GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 76 79 80 90 91 MB/s
|
50.3%
Above average
|
62% 83.9 MB/s
|
185% 1.33 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
|
99%
Outstanding
|
103% 36.2 GB/s
|
81% 28.4 GB/s
|
52% 76.9 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 5,070x |
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 3,222x |
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $160Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 2,996x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $269Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 1,527x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 1,335x |
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 1,324x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $628 |