TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (99th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 1 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2PH  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '19 at 04:23
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 188
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 350
47% 348 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 76%
 Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.5067
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 6.54
Parallax 5.75
3% 5.26 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.61
5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.64%
 Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful SL500 2 240GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 416 424 435 438 437 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 441
Mixed 417
SusWrite 430
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 34.4
170% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 40.6
71% 134 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 105%
 Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273TB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.1% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 18.8
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.5
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 61.1%
 Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-H81M-S2PH Builds (Compare 733 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PH

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel  $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples103x
Core i7-4790Intel  $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples74x
Core i5-4440Intel  $99Bench 61%, 81,111 samples60x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples119x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples67x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples37x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples41x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples15x
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples11x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples20x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples15x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples11x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback