Notebook W35xSTQ_370ST

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNotebook W35xSTQ_370ST  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W35xSTQ_370ST
Memory10.1 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140312
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 23 '16 at 00:47
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 195
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 516
53% 428 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 765M
Clevo(1558 3537) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.6909
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 15
Parallax 18.9
14% 16.9 fps
MRender 17.6
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 14.4
13% 15.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hgst HTS541010A9E680 240GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 512
Write 487
Mixed 494
111% 498 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 14.4
100% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 67.8
95% 176 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 89%
Toshiba MK3265GSXN 320GB
295GB free
Firmware: GH101M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 82.9
Write 84.5
Mixed 79.5
62% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.35
89% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT325S6CFR8A-PB Hynix HMT351S6CFR8A-PB 14GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.2% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 10.5
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W35xSTQ_370ST Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W35xSTQ_370ST

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback