Asus X75VB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X75VB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X75VB
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130604
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '16 at 21:29
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 84.4
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 131
61% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 185
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 14C7) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.62% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 2.75
3% 4.03 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.65
4% 4.88 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hgst HTS541010A9E680 240GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 560ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 478
Write 190
Mixed 246
67% 304 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 9.1
69% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 62.4
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 11.8
38% 80.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 89%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
736GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 90.6
Write 102
Mixed 79.1
68% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.19
67% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 57%
Corsair Slider 3.0 16GB
5GB free, PID 1a06
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 16.6
Mixed 27.6
32% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.93
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.08
29% 2.34 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida Asint SSZ302G08-GGNHC 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.4% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.7
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X75VB Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X75VB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback