Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20150

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20150  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '22 at 23:19
Run Duration413 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Memory 52.2
1-Core 32.9
2-Core 47.9
30% 44.3 Pts
4-Core 52.9
8-Core 53.9
7% 53.4 Pts
64-Core 55.6
3% 55.6 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 635M
Legend(17AA 3901) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 6.5
3% 5.37 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 3.1
3% 4.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 257 298 268 316 344 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 405
Write 378
Mixed 362
SusWrite 296
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 30
97% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 83.8
DQ Mixed 102
81% 116 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 129%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
802GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Mixed 2
2% 2 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28.7% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20150 Builds (Compare 846 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback