PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Z97-A (all builds) |
Memory | 16.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150427 |
Uptime | 2.9 Days |
Run Date | Sep 08 '19 at 00:41 |
Run Duration | 172 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-4790-$115
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
79.3%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 866D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 389 401 417 420 418 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 124 128 131 130 MB/s
|
73.5%
Very good
|
|||
Multi-Reader -1 32GB
30GB free, PID 6368
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
8.35%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
56%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 2,392x |
Core i5-4690KIntel $43Bench 70%, 229,359 samples | 1,233x |
Core i7-4790Intel $115Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 444x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 818x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $200Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 356x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 314x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Above average | Total price: $798 |