Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X10DAi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics64.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X10DAi  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DAC
Memory241.5 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180205
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateSep 09 '19 at 04:47
Run Duration351 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 40 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 174
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 668
60% 509 Pts
64-Core 3,378
209% 3,378 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 367C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
64.6% Good
Lighting 82.3
Reflection 83.3
Parallax 71.6
67% 79 fps
MRender 80.3
Gravity 74.9
Splatting 67.2
60% 74.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 66%
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
EVGA(3842 6188) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 124
Reflection 147
Parallax 119
101% 130 fps
Gravity 133
Splatting 111
106% 122 fps
Poor: 93% Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$66
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 172 172 172 171 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 415
Write 414
Mixed 269
SusWrite 173
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 38.4
124% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 272
214% 297 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 117%
Mushkin MKNSSDTR500GB-3DX 500GB
316GB free
Firmware: 1ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 236 233 231 234 234 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 433
Write 404
Mixed 411
SusWrite 234
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 34.3
126% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 265
217% 309 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 127%
Mushkin MKNSSDTR500GB-3DX 500GB
119GB free
Firmware: 1ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 236 233 232 234 233 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 432
Write 418
Mixed 387
SusWrite 234
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 36.8
125% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 273
221% 313 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 127%
Mushkin MKNSSDTR500GB-3DX 500GB
216GB free
Firmware: 1ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 236 232 231 234 232 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 434
Write 415
Mixed 410
SusWrite 234
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 40
131% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 264
213% 302 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 127%
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$66
80GB free
Firmware: 90WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 175 174 160 174 172 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 418
Write 400
Mixed 288
SusWrite 171
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 36.9
132% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 220
192% 288 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 117%
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$66
80GB free
Firmware: 90WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 174 173 174 174 188 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 421
Write 400
Mixed 236
SusWrite 176
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 25.3
109% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 280
221% 309 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 117%
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$66
64GB free
Firmware: 90WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 333 270 304 316 245 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 404
Write 410
Mixed 238
SusWrite 302
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 31.3
117% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 269
218% 309 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 117%
Mushkin MKNSSDTR500GB-3DX 500GB
248GB free
Firmware: 1ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 275 280 276 274 286 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 437
Write 408
Mixed 409
SusWrite 273
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 37.2
134% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 269
216% 303 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 127%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 7TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 6.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 696 617 621 628 632 633 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 7TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 2.14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 9.5 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40EB1-CRC 16x16GB
16 of 16 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
116% Outstanding
MC Read 68.3
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 38
134% 46.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 116%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X10DAi Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Supermicro X10DAi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $202
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback